| |
| Web URL(s): | http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2008/68.pdf
Last checked: 01/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Landschoot, Peter;
Fidanza, Michael |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| Title: | Comparison of chlorothalonil, propiconazole, and iprodione products for control of dollar spot and brown patch diseases |
|---|
| Section: | Grant-in-aid research program
Other records with the "Grant-in-aid research program" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | 2008 Turfgrass and Environmental Research Summary. 2008, p. 68. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Far Hills, NJ: United States Golf Association |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 1 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Comparisons; Chlorothalonil; Propiconazole; Iprodione; Dollar spot; Rhizoctonia blight; Disease control; Herbicide evaluation
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| See Also: | Other Reports from this USGA research project: 2008-18-388 |
|---|
| Note: | Graphs |
|---|
| USGA Summary Points: | With respect to dollar spot control, iprodione products generally showed better control than chlorothalonil and propiconazole products at the central Pennsylvania location. However, in the southeastern Pennsylvania trial, the three different active ingredients were very similar in controlling dollar spot. Generally, chlorothalonil and iprodione products provided better brown patch control than propiconazole products. All chlorothalonil products included in this study (Daconil Ultrex, Echo Ultimate, and Chlorothalonil DF) performed similarly in both dollar spot trials and the brown patch trial. No differences among propiconazolecontaining products (Banner MAXX, Propiconazole 14.3, Propensity 1.3ME, and Spectator Ultra 1.3) were observed with respect to dollar spot control in either dollar spot trial. However, AUDPC values indicated better brown patch efficacy for Propensity 1.3ME compared with Spectator Ultra 1.3 when evaluated over the entire 2008 test period. Of the three iprodione products (Chipco 26GT, Ipro 2SE, and Raven) Chipco 26GT and Ipro 2SE provided the most consistent dollar spot control. Raven showed less dollar spot control compared with Chipco 26GT and Ipro 2SE on several rating dates and in AUDPC values in both trials. |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Landschoot, P., and M. Fidanza. 2008. Comparison of chlorothalonil, propiconazole, and iprodione products for control of dollar spot and brown patch diseases. Turfgrass Environ. Res. Summ. p. 68. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=144298 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 144298. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2008/68.pdf
Last checked: 01/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .A1 A6 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
