Full TGIF Record # 113002
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2006-0531-02-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Xiong, Xi; Bell, Gregory E.; Smith, Michael W.; Martin, Bjorn
Author Affiliation:Xiong: Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville; Bell and Smith: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Martin: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
Title:Comparison of the USGA and Airfield sand systems for sports turf construction
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. May 31 2006, p. [1-8].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:8
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: United States Golf Association; Cynodon dactylon; Cynodon transvaalensis; Sports turf; Sports turf construction; Drainage; Slope; Temperatures; Soil temperature; Soil water retention; Root length density; Soil properties; Sand; USGA recommendations; Comparisons; Airfield system
Cultivar Names:Tifsport
Abstract/Contents:"The purpose of this research was to compare the Airfield system with a USGA system for soil factors that affect 'Tifsport' bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy) growth and to determine if the drainage in these systems was sufficient to maintain consistent gravimetric water content throughout the system regardless of relative elevation along a 2% slope. Canopy temperature and root and soil properties were evaluted monthly from May to October in 2003 and 2004. The two systems did not differ in soil temperature, canopy temperature, soil gravimetric water content, and root density in the 7.7-to 15.2-cm soil layer but the USGA system had higher root density in the 0.0- to 7.6-cm soil layer. Both systems retained more water and drained more poorly as elevation decreased from high to middle to low along a 2% slope. Root density was significantly greater at the lowest elevation compared with the middle elevation and significantly greater in the middle elevation compared with the highest elevation. The composite results suggested that the Airfield system was not substantially different from the USGA system."
Language:English
References:7
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Xiong, X., G. E. Bell, M. W. Smith, and B. Martin. 2006. Comparison of the USGA and Airfield sand systems for sports turf construction. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. p. [1-8].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=113002
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 113002.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2006-0531-02-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)