| |
DOI: | 10.1094/ATS-2006-0531-02-RS |
Web URL(s): | https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS Last checked: 03/05/2014 Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS Last checked: 03/05/2014 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
Publication Type:
| Refereed |
Author(s): | Xiong, Xi;
Bell, Gregory E.;
Smith, Michael W.;
Martin, Bjorn |
Author Affiliation: | Xiong: Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville; Bell and Smith: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Martin: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater |
Title: | Comparison of the USGA and Airfield sand systems for sports turf construction |
Section: | Applied turfgrass research Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
|
Source: | Applied Turfgrass Science. May 31 2006, p. [1-8]. |
Publishing Information: | Plant Management Network |
# of Pages: | 8 |
Related Web URL: | https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS Last checked: 03/05/2014 Notes: Abstract only |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: United States Golf Association; Cynodon dactylon; Cynodon transvaalensis; Sports turf; Sports turf construction; Drainage; Slope; Temperatures; Soil temperature; Soil water retention; Root length density; Soil properties; Sand; USGA recommendations; Comparisons; Airfield system
|
Cultivar Names: | Tifsport |
Abstract/Contents: | "The purpose of this research was to compare the Airfield system with a USGA system for soil factors that affect 'Tifsport' bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. x C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy) growth and to determine if the drainage in these systems was sufficient to maintain consistent gravimetric water content throughout the system regardless of relative elevation along a 2% slope. Canopy temperature and root and soil properties were evaluted monthly from May to October in 2003 and 2004. The two systems did not differ in soil temperature, canopy temperature, soil gravimetric water content, and root density in the 7.7-to 15.2-cm soil layer but the USGA system had higher root density in the 0.0- to 7.6-cm soil layer. Both systems retained more water and drained more poorly as elevation decreased from high to middle to low along a 2% slope. Root density was significantly greater at the lowest elevation compared with the middle elevation and significantly greater in the middle elevation compared with the highest elevation. The composite results suggested that the Airfield system was not substantially different from the USGA system." |
Language: | English |
References: | 7 |
Note: | Pictures, color Tables Graphs |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Xiong, X., G. E. Bell, M. W. Smith, and B. Martin. 2006. Comparison of the USGA and Airfield sand systems for sports turf construction. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. p. [1-8]. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=113002 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 113002. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2006-0531-02-RS |
| Web URL(s): https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS Last checked: 03/05/2014 Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0531-02-RS Last checked: 03/05/2014 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |