| |
Web URL(s): | http://www.golfcourseindustry.com/gci0912-using-reclaimed-water-city.aspx Last checked: 10/18/2012 http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/gcnew/article/2012sep46.pdf Last checked: 12/10/2013 Requires: PDF Reader |
Publication Type:
| Trade |
Author(s): | McPherson, David |
Author Affiliation: | Freelance Writer, Toronto |
Title: | No other options: Evaluating the costs of using reclaimed water vs. city H2O. Which makes the most sense for your agronomic needs? |
Section: | Irrigation Other records with the "Irrigation" Section
|
Source: | Golf Course Industry. Vol. 24, No. 9, September 2012, p. 46-49. |
Publishing Information: | Cleveland, Ohio: G.I.E. Media, Inc. |
# of Pages: | 4 |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Cost efficiency; Course profile; Effluent water use; Environmental stewardship; Irrigation practices; Water conservation; Water quality
|
Facility Names: | Laurel Hill Golf Club, in Lorton, Virginia |
Language: | English |
References: | 0 |
See Also: | Other items relating to: Effluent Water Use |
Note: | Includes sidebars, "Reclaimed water benefits", p. 47 and "For more online", p. 49 Pictures, color |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): McPherson, D. 2012. No other options: Evaluating the costs of using reclaimed water vs. city H2O. Which makes the most sense for your agronomic needs?. Golf Course Industry. 24(9):p. 46-49. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=212149 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 212149. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): http://www.golfcourseindustry.com/gci0912-using-reclaimed-water-city.aspx Last checked: 10/18/2012 http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/gcnew/article/2012sep46.pdf Last checked: 12/10/2013 Requires: PDF Reader |
| MSU catalog number: b5475861a |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |