Full TGIF Record # 250253
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://scisoc.confex.com/crops/2014am/webprogram/Paper88251.html
    Last checked: 10/31/2014
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Lulis, Timothy T.; Kaminski, John E.
Author Affiliation:Lulis: Pennsylvania State University, State College; Kaminski: Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Title:Effect of various hydraulic fluids on creeping bentgrass injury
Section:C05 Turfgrass Science
Other records with the "C05 Turfgrass Science" Section

Turfgrass cultural management: Irrigation and fertility
Other records with the "Turfgrass cultural management: Irrigation and fertility" Section
Meeting Info.:Long Beach, California: November 2-5, 2014
Source:ASA, CSSA and SSSA Annual Meetings [2014]. 2014, p. 88251.
Publishing Information:[Milwaukee, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy]
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Alternative fuels; Environmental impact; Hydraulic oil leaks; Injurious factors; Petroleum; Turf recovery
Abstract/Contents:"Hydraulic fluid leaks from turfgrass equipment can result in significant long term damage to turfgrass swards. While alternatives to conventional hydraulic fluids (i.e., petroleum oil-based oils) are available, there is limited research-based data regarding the safety of these products to creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.; CBG). Previous work has shown that vegetable oils and biodegradable plant seed oils (polyol ester-based oils) had less long term effects when compared to petroleum-based oils in warm and cool season turfgrasses, respectively (Berndt, 2006; Elliott and Prevatte, 1995; Gaussoin, 1998). While the results of these studies provide valuable information, there has been limited research on the safety of various synthetic fluids on CBG. The objectives of these studies were to: 1) compare the safety of several synthetic hydraulic fluids when applied to CBG; 2) determine the influence of post-application remediation on reducing injury; and 3) identify the potential influence of water source on post-application remediation. Two field studies were conducted at the Valentine Turfgrass Research Center located in University Park, PA between 2011 and 2012. Studies were conducted on a 'Penn A-4' CBG research putting green. Hydraulic fluids evaluated included; two synthetic ester-based fluids, a synthetic water soluble polyakleylene glycol-based fluid, and a petroleum oil-based fluid. Injury to CBG from a simulated hydraulic fluid spill varied among products and remediation techniques. All products resulted in unacceptable injury when initially applied. Turfgrass recovery, however, was possible within 14 to 20 days when post application water or soap remediation was implemented on CBG treated with water soluble polyalkylene glycol-based synthetic hydraulic fluid. Creeping bentgrass recovery was not observed within 30 to 38 days within plots treated with synthetic ester or petroleum-based fluids, regardless of remediation. Water source did not influence creeping bentgrass recovery regardless of fluid evaluated."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"398-8"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Lulis, T. T., and J. E. Kaminski. 2014. Effect of various hydraulic fluids on creeping bentgrass injury. Agron. Abr. p. 88251.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=250253
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 250253.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://scisoc.confex.com/crops/2014am/webprogram/Paper88251.html
    Last checked: 10/31/2014
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)