Full TGIF Record # 256995
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2134/cftm2014.0087
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/cftm2014.0087
    Last checked: 02/05/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2134/cftm2014.0087
    Last checked: 02/05/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Goldsby, Anthony L.; Bremer, Dale J.; Fry, Jack D.; Keeley, Steven J.
Author Affiliation:Goldsby: Ewing Irrigation, Olathe; Bremer, Fry, and Keeley: Dep. of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS
Title:Response and recovery characteristics of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars to extended drought
Section:Applied turfgrass science
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management. Vol. 1, No. 1, December 2015, p. 1-8.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Cultivar evaluation; Drought recovery; Drought resistance; Greenness in drought; Irrigation methods; Poa pratensis; Water use restrictions
Cultivar Names:Apollo; Bedazzled
Abstract/Contents:"During drought, authorities may impose water restrictions for irrigation with little regard for damage to turfgrass. Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) (KBG) cultivars during a prolonged dry down and subsequent recovery in the transition zone near Manhattan, KS, USA. Irrigation was withheld from 30 bluegrasses for 82 days in 2010 and 62 days in 2011. Rainfall was excluded from the study area with an automated rainout shelter. Digital images were collected every one to two weeks during dry down and recovery to obtain percent green turfgrass coverage. All cultivars were predominantly brown (0 to 3% green cover) by the end of the 82-day dry down in 2010, and less brown (7 to 27% green cover) by the end of the 62-day dry down in 2011, probably because all plots inadvertently received 1.54 inches of precipitation during the 2011 dry down. All 30 bluegrasses recovered after lengthy dry downs in both years, but recovery was slower in 2010 because of greater drought stress during the longer dry down. Differences in performance were observed among cultivars during the dry downs and recoveries, but were inconsistent between years. Exceptions during the dry down were Apollo and Bedazzled, which lost green cover more slowly than other cultivars; Apollo also recovered more quickly after drought than other cultivars. Bluegrasses have excellent recuperative ability even after severe drought, and are good choices for areas where extended bans on turfgrass irrigation are possible."
Language:English
References:21
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Goldsby, A. L., D. J. Bremer, J. D. Fry, and S. J. Keeley. 2015. Response and recovery characteristics of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars to extended drought. Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management. 1(1):p. 1-8.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=256995
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 256995.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2134/cftm2014.0087
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/cftm2014.0087
    Last checked: 02/05/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2134/cftm2014.0087
    Last checked: 02/05/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)