Full TGIF Record # 313064
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1002/csc2.20279
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csc2.20279
    Last checked: 11/25/2020
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csc2.20279
    Last checked: 11/25/2020
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Petrella, Dominic P.; Watkins, Eric
Author Affiliation:Dep. of Horticultural Science, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Title:Variation in fine fescue taxa response to simulated foliar shade
Section:Original research articles
Other records with the "Original research articles" Section

Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 60, No. 6, November/December 2020, p. 3377-3394.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:18
Abstract/Contents:"Fine fescues, taxa within the Festuca genus, are considered some of the most shade-tolerant cool-season turfgrasses, but past research from field studies has been inconsistent. The objective of this research was to evaluate variation in Chewings fescue (Festuca rubra L. ssp. commutata Gaudin, CH), hard fescue (F. brevipila Tracey, HD), and strong creeping red fescue (F. rubra ssp. rubra Gaudin, ST) morphology and physiology under simulated foliar shade and full sun. Experiments were carried out using 12 CH, 13 HD, and 15 ST entries within a greenhouse with or without a photoselective filter to simulate foliar shade. The filter reduced the red to far-red (R/FR) ratio to ~0.66, and light intensity was reduced to 30% of full sun under shade treatment. Several parameters were assessed including height, the number of tillers, biomass, total chlorophyll, and the chlorophyll a/b ratio. In both sun and shade experiments, ST were significantly taller than the other taxa. Chewings fescue and HD had significantly more tillers than ST in sun, but both CH and ST had significantly more tillers than HD in shade. Hard fescue had the greatest biomass in sun, and the least in shade. Significantly more CH genotypes lacked shade avoidance responses (SAR) than both other taxa under shade, and a greater proportion of HD were shade intolerant. Based on this study, CH > ST > HD in terms of improved response to shade. However, variation for response to shade observed within entries indicates potential for future improvement."
Language:English
References:49
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
2020. Variation in fine fescue taxa response to simulated foliar shade. Crop Sci. 60(6):p. 3377-3394.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.lib.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=313064
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 313064.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20279
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csc2.20279
    Last checked: 11/25/2020
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csc2.20279
    Last checked: 11/25/2020
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2211522a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)